Game Analysis
Lean – MINNESOTA (-1) vs New Orleans
This rematch of last year’s Minnesota Miracle will feature the league’s best tandem of offensive tackles versus the league’s best edge rushing duo with Everson Griffen expected to return after sitting out for personal reasons since week 3. Ryan Ramczyk and Terron Armstead rank 1st and 5th respectively in pass blocking efficiency and lead a Saints offensive line that’s surrendered the 2nd-fewest pressures in the league (37). Everson Griffen will be an impactful boost for this Vikings defense as he’s made 3 consecutive Pro Bowls and recorded 13 sacks in 2017 (4th), while Danielle Hunter 34 pressures thus far in 2018 rank 3rd among edge rushers.
Drew Brees has been fortunate to be the only qualifying quarterback without an interception this season as it is expected one of his 220 passes would’ve been tipped/batted into a fluke pick even if he’d played flawlessly. However, Brees has a decent shot of getting out of this game without a turnover because he should be able to reliably check-down to Alvin Kamara and Mark Ingram with Minnesota’s defense allowing 9.5 yards per target to opposing running backs (last). Pro Bowl defenders Anthony Barr and Xavier Rhodes are both banged-up but Mike Zimmer thinks there’s a good chance they will play, while starting safety Andrew Sendejo remains questionable.
The Saints traded for Giants’ CB Eli Apple, who’s only slightly above replacement level, but he should be a major improvement as their second cornerback opposite Marshon Lattimore given that Ken Crawley is conceding 2.21 yards per cover snap this season, which ranks last among all 75 qualifying cornerbacks. So, Apple is an upgrade even if though he’s worse than average. Adam Thielen’s 100-yard game streak continued last week and he also leads the league with 43 first down receptions. Thielen is gaining 2.21 yards per route run from the slot this season and it will be interesting to see how P.J. Williams, who’s filled in adequately for the injured Patrick Robinson, matches up inside. Williams has surrendered just 0.79 yards per cover snap in the slot, which ranks 5th among nickelbacks since he started playing regularly in week 4.
Our model makes this game pick but Minnesota applies to an 80-25-1 ATS home momentum situation while New Orleans applies to a 36-97-2 ATS road letdown situation that is based on last week’s upset win at Baltimore. I will lean with Minnesota based on the situation and this Sunday night clash will certainly be worth watching as two of the top teams in the NFC square-off.
Pass
-
Pass Plays
38.0
35.0
-
Succ Pass Plays
58.8%
58.1%
-
Sack Rate
4.2%
6.3%
-
Int Rate
0.0%
1.3%
-
Deep Pass Rate
14.1%
21.1%
-
Big Pass Yards
45.5%
42.1%
-
NYPP
8.0
8.8
Rush
-
Rush Plays
29.3
24.0
-
RB YPR
3.5
2.8
-
Stuff Rate
14.8%
25.7%
-
Succ Rush Plays
49.2%
41.7%
-
Big Rush Yards
28.1%
33.4%
-
Yards Per Rush
3.7
3.1
Game
-
All Snaps
67.3
59.0
-
Early Down Succ
58.2%
51.5%
-
Succ Rate
54.4%
51.1%
-
Big Yards Rate
41.0%
40.4%
-
Yards Per Play
6.1
6.2
-
Fumble Lost Rate
1.6%
0.9%
-
Time Per Play (sec)
29.2
29.3
-
Run Ratio
43.2%
40.5%
-
Starting Field Pos
31.4
26.1
-
Game Control
1.2
-1.2
Pass
-
Pass Plays
44.4
35.3
-
Succ Pass Plays
51.6%
47.5%
-
Sack Rate
6.1%
8.8%
-
Int Rate
1.0%
2.8%
-
Deep Pass Rate
13.4%
20.0%
-
Big Pass Yards
30.3%
54.7%
-
NYPP
6.7
7.6
Rush
-
Rush Plays
22.3
24.1
-
RB YPR
3.6
3.8
-
Stuff Rate
27.8%
24.3%
-
Succ Rush Plays
35.4%
47.7%
-
Big Rush Yards
48.4%
29.1%
-
Yards Per Rush
3.7
3.8
Game
-
All Snaps
66.7
59.4
-
Early Down Succ
49.0%
50.5%
-
Succ Rate
46.8%
47.5%
-
Big Yards Rate
35.7%
47.6%
-
Yards Per Play
5.7
6.0
-
Fumble Lost Rate
1.3%
1.4%
-
Time Per Play (sec)
28.2
30.9
-
Run Ratio
33.5%
40.6%
-
Starting Field Pos
29.1
29.1
-
Game Control
-0.3
0.3
* game log stats denoted as Off/Def
2018 Game Log |
PASS |
RUSH |
GAMES |
Wk |
Opp |
Score |
Game Control |
Succ Pass Plays |
Sack Rate |
Int Rate |
NYPP |
Succ Rush Plays |
Stuff Rate |
Yds per Rush |
All Snaps |
Early Down Succ |
Succ Rate |
Big Yards Rate |
Yds per Play |
Fum Lost Rate |
Run Ratio |
Starting Field Pos |
1 |
TB |
40 – 48 L |
-7.4 |
73.9% / 64.3% |
2.2% / 0.0% |
0.0% / 0.0% |
9.4 / 14.9 |
69.2% / 43.2% |
23.1% / 18.9% |
3.3 / 3.1 |
59 / 65 |
77.6% / 56.5% |
72.9% / 52.3% |
36.4% / 62.7% |
8.1 / 8.2 |
3.4% / 0.0% |
22.0% / 56.9% |
25.9 / 26.4 |
2 |
CLE |
21 – 18 W |
-2.8 |
63.2% / 48.5% |
7.9% / 9.1% |
0.0% / 3.3% |
5.6 / 7.1 |
37.5% / 33.3% |
25.0% / 14.8% |
2.6 / 3.4 |
62 / 60 |
60.4% / 43.5% |
53.2% / 41.7% |
30.8% / 43.4% |
4.5 / 5.5 |
3.2% / 0.0% |
38.7% / 45.0% |
35.0 / 28.4 |
3 |
@ATL |
43 – 37 W |
0.3 |
56.0% / 63.2% |
2.0% / 7.9% |
0.0% / 0.0% |
7.8 / 9.4 |
53.6% / 21.7% |
14.3% / 43.5% |
5.1 / 2.1 |
78 / 61 |
57.4% / 52.1% |
55.1% / 47.5% |
37.9% / 36.3% |
6.9 / 6.7 |
0.0% / 0.0% |
35.9% / 37.7% |
29.8 / 24.1 |
4 |
@NYG |
33 – 18 W |
3.5 |
42.9% / 56.8% |
2.9% / 6.8% |
0.0% / 0.0% |
6.3 / 5.3 |
48.6% / 50.0% |
8.6% / 18.8% |
4.9 / 4.1 |
70 / 60 |
51.0% / 58.3% |
45.7% / 55.0% |
55.4% / 29.3% |
5.6 / 5.0 |
0.0% / 3.3% |
50.0% / 26.7% |
33.9 / 22.5 |
5 |
WAS |
43 – 19 W |
15.4 |
71.4% / 69.2% |
7.1% / 11.5% |
0.0% / 4.3% |
12.5 / 9.4 |
36.1% / 50.0% |
5.6% / 27.8% |
2.8 / 2.2 |
64 / 44 |
54.9% / 48.8% |
51.6% / 61.4% |
54.3% / 51.2% |
7.0 / 6.4 |
1.6% / 2.3% |
56.3% / 40.9% |
36.2 / 33.4 |
7 |
@BAL |
24 – 23 W |
-1.7 |
45.2% / 46.3% |
3.2% / 2.4% |
0.0% / 0.0% |
6.6 / 6.7 |
50.0% / 52.2% |
12.5% / 30.4% |
3.4 / 3.3 |
71 / 64 |
48.0% / 50.0% |
47.9% / 48.4% |
31.2% / 19.7% |
4.8 / 5.5 |
1.4% / 0.0% |
56.3% / 35.9% |
27.6 / 21.8 |
* game log stats denoted as Off/Def
2018 Game Log |
PASS |
RUSH |
GAMES |
Wk |
Opp |
Score |
Game Control |
Succ Pass Plays |
Sack Rate |
Int Rate |
NYPP |
Succ Rush Plays |
Stuff Rate |
Yds per Rush |
All Snaps |
Early Down Succ |
Succ Rate |
Big Yards Rate |
Yds per Play |
Fum Lost Rate |
Run Ratio |
Starting Field Pos |
1 |
SF |
24 – 16 W |
7.6 |
43.6% / 38.9% |
7.7% / 8.3% |
0.0% / 9.1% |
5.8 / 6.6 |
40.6% / 44.0% |
21.9% / 32.0% |
3.6 / 3.6 |
71 / 61 |
43.4% / 41.7% |
42.3% / 41.0% |
24.5% / 60.9% |
4.8 / 5.4 |
1.4% / 1.6% |
45.1% / 41.0% |
33.3 / 23.1 |
2 |
@GB |
29 – 29 T |
-6.3 |
56.0% / 48.9% |
4.0% / 8.9% |
2.1% / 0.0% |
8.2 / 5.6 |
44.4% / 54.2% |
5.6% / 25.0% |
3.8 / 4.1 |
68 / 69 |
53.7% / 55.4% |
52.9% / 50.7% |
44.4% / 31.3% |
7.1 / 5.1 |
0.0% / 0.0% |
26.5% / 34.8% |
26.5 / 29.9 |
3 |
BUF |
6 – 27 L |
-22.0 |
47.5% / 40.0% |
6.8% / 12.0% |
1.8% / 0.0% |
4.7 / 6.6 |
16.7% / 42.1% |
50.0% / 23.7% |
2.3 / 3.4 |
65 / 63 |
48.0% / 42.9% |
44.6% / 41.3% |
3.8% / 42.1% |
4.5 / 4.6 |
3.1% / 0.0% |
9.2% / 60.3% |
17.7 / 40.2 |
4 |
@LA |
31 – 38 L |
-3.9 |
51.9% / 60.0% |
7.4% / 2.9% |
0.0% / 0.0% |
7.3 / 13.0 |
35.3% / 57.1% |
35.3% / 14.3% |
3.2 / 4.8 |
71 / 56 |
45.3% / 68.1% |
47.9% / 58.9% |
38.8% / 55.7% |
6.3 / 9.9 |
1.4% / 0.0% |
23.9% / 37.5% |
27.2 / 26.6 |
5 |
@PHI |
23 – 21 W |
7.0 |
74.2% / 80.8% |
3.2% / 11.5% |
0.0% / 0.0% |
9.6 / 10.9 |
44.0% / 58.8% |
20.0% / 11.8% |
3.2 / 4.8 |
56 / 43 |
62.5% / 63.6% |
60.7% / 72.1% |
48.8% / 51.9% |
6.7 / 8.5 |
1.8% / 4.7% |
44.6% / 39.5% |
27.0 / 30.9 |
6 |
ARI |
27 – 17 W |
8.0 |
54.1% / 37.1% |
10.8% / 11.4% |
3.0% / 3.2% |
5.8 / 5.9 |
42.4% / 40.0% |
18.2% / 30.0% |
5.9 / 3.1 |
70 / 55 |
54.7% / 48.8% |
48.6% / 38.2% |
31.3% / 41.3% |
5.9 / 4.9 |
1.4% / 1.8% |
47.1% / 36.4% |
30.9 / 25.5 |
7 |
@NYJ |
37 – 17 W |
7.4 |
34.1% / 26.7% |
2.4% / 6.7% |
0.0% / 7.1% |
5.6 / 4.3 |
24.0% / 37.5% |
44.0% / 33.3% |
3.6 / 3.0 |
66 / 69 |
35.4% / 33.3% |
30.3% / 30.4% |
58.0% / 50.2% |
4.8 / 3.8 |
0.0% / 1.4% |
37.9% / 34.8% |
41.4 / 27.3 |