The Free Analysis page Leans are now 1101-913-38 all-time.

 

The Leans were just 81-80-3 for the 2025 season.

 

For the season the record on all sides is 274-274-6 ATS, including 61-60-3 on Leans, and the record on all totals this season is 307-276-1 with the specified Leans being 20-20.

 

The record on all Free Analysis sides is now 3416-3200-116 ATS since 2013, which is very good picking nearly every game over 13 years. The Free Analysis sides in which my predicted margin was 4 points or more away from the line (i.e Leans) are a profitable 1008-853-37.

 

Totals on the Free pages are now 3261-3060-62 in the 12 seasons I’ve been tracking them. Starting in 2022 I have chosen selected Leans on totals and those are now 93-61-1 in 3-plus seasons.

 

The spreads posted are the consensus lines at the time I posted each analysis.

 

2018-2025 College Football Results

Best Bets: 325-258-19 (55.7%) – 55.1% over 38 Years

Strong Opinions: 181-152-3 (54.4%)

All analysis is reserved for season subscribers in the postseason.

Southeast

Alabama vs
Indiana

Thu, Jan 1 1:00 PM PT

Rotation: 261, Odds: Indiana -7, Total: 48

Game Analysis view matchup stats

Create an account to get analysis and updates sent to your inbox.

Indiana (-7)  28   Alabama  20

It may seem strange the Indiana is favored by a touchdown over Alabama but the Hoosiers should be favored by more than 7 points based on my math, which favors Indiana by 8.5 points with 48.3 total points.

Alabama’s offense depends on the arm of Ty Simpson, as the Crimson Tide simply don’t have their usual strong rush attack this season (4.2 yards per rushing play against teams that would allow 4.1 yprp to an average team). Simpson averaged 6.5 yards per pass play against FBS teams that would combine to allow 5.3 yppp to an average quarterback. Simpson only threw 5 interceptions but he should have thrown more based on his 38 passes defended against (which projects to 7.8 interceptions).

Indiana has an elite defense that allowed just 11.8 points per game and rates at 1.3 yppl better than average. The Hoosiers have proven themselves against better offensive teams by holding Oregon and Ohio State to an average of just 15 points. I project 322 yards at 5.3 yppl for Alabama in this game.

Indiana’s offense averaged 6.8 yppl against FBS teams with starters in the game against teams that would allow just 5.1 yppl to an average offense and their rating would be higher if they didn’t go run-heavy in blowout wins. Indiana ran the ball 58% of the time but just 52% of the time when the games were competitive and I expect more passing than normal in this game, which will boost their offense a bit. I project 386 yards at 6.4 yppl for the Hoosiers in this game against an Alabama defense that was 1.1 yppl better than average this season (5.1 yppl allowed to FBS teams that would combine to average 6.2 yppl against an average defense).

Kalen DeBoer’s teams have a strong tendency to play their best against better teams, as he is now 13-3 straight up and 14-2 ATS when favored by less than 3 points, a pick, or underdog (2-1 this year with a split of 2 games against Georgia and a win over Oklahoma in their first playoff game). However, Indiana’s Curt Cignetti is 33-17 ATS in his career in all games at the FBS level and the Hoosiers are 2-0 straight up (both as underdogs) against the elite teams that they’ve played this season (at Oregon and vs Ohio State).

Mississippi vs
Georgia

Thu, Jan 1 5:00 PM PT

Rotation: 263, Odds: Georgia -6.5, Total: 55.5

Game Analysis view matchup stats

Create an account to get analysis and updates sent to your inbox.

Georgia (-6.5)  30   Mississippi  25

It’s still hard to say how much not having Lane Kiffin will affect the Ole Miss offense. They actually played better than expected against Tulane in their first playoff game (514 yards at 7.8 yards per play) but I suspect there will be a negative impact in this game. Even so, I still would rather have Mississippi plus the points.

Mississippi’s offense was 1.6 yards per play better than average with Trinidad Chambliss at quarterback this season and I project 390 yards at 5.9 yppl for the Rebels against a Georgia defense that was 1.4 yppl better than average this season. Georgia is without LB Gabe Harris, who is third on the team in total tackles for loss (6.5) and he’s worth 0.4 points. Ole Miss averaged 5.9 yppl and scored 35 points in a loss at Georgia earlier this season so 6.0 yppl seems reasonable.

Georgia’s offense was just 0.5 yppl better than average this season (5.9 yppl against teams that would allow 5.4 yppl to an average offense) but they tend to play very vanilla scheme’s as huge favorites, so I decided to discard their early season games against Marshall and Austin Peay. Georgia’s pass game gets a boost with the return from injury of WR Colbie Young, who missed the last 6 games after averaging 10.8 yards per target over the first 7 games of the season. I still rate Georgia’s offense at just 0.7 yards per play better than average even after taking out their first 2 games and giving their pass game a 0.2 yppp boost for getting Young back.

Mississippi’s defense was just 0.5 yppl better than average this season (barely worse than Georgia’s offense) and I don’t expect them to play as horribly as they did in their loss at Georgia when the Bulldogs gained 513 yards at 6.7 yppl. That was Gunner Stockton’s best game and I consider it a fluke. I project 415 yards at 6.0 yppl for the Bulldogs in this game, even with a boost for being in a dome.

The math only favors Georgia by 3.3 points (and 56.7 total points) and I’ll dock Ole Miss a bit for Kiffin not calling plays for the Rebels, which should matter more against a good defense than it did against Tulane.