Game Analysis
CINCINNATI (-14) 26 Tulsa 13
Both of these teams are very good defensively, as Cincy has allowed just 15 points per game and rates at 1.5 yards per play better than average while Tulsa has yielded only 19.9 points per game and has been 1.2 yppl better than average on the stop side of the ball. Cincinnati has a better offense (+0.5 yppl vs -0.2 yppl) and overall the math favors the Bearcats by 14 points. However, Tulsa applies to a 214-120-15 ATS situation that plays on underdogs with a strong defense. The better play, however, is the under.
Rush
-
Run Plays
36.9
38.4
-
Run Yards
160.9
147.7
-
YPRP
4.7
4.1
Pass
-
Pass Comp
19.1
19.3
-
Pass Att
32.7
31.7
-
Comp %
58.5%
60.8%
-
Pass Yards
252.1
195.6
-
Sacks
2.0
2.1
-
Sack Yards
13.4
11.7
-
Sack %
5.8%
6.3%
-
Pass Plays
34.7
33.9
-
Net Pass Yards
238.7
183.9
-
YPPP
6.9
5.4
Total
-
Total Plays
71.6
72.3
-
Total Yards
413.0
343.3
-
YPPL
5.8
4.7
TO
-
Int
1.0
0.9
-
Int %
3.1%
2.7%
-
Fumbles
1.0
1.1
-
Turnovers
2.0
2.0
Rush
-
Run Plays
37.4
33.9
-
Run Yards
210.9
104.4
-
YPRP
5.8
3.7
Pass
-
Pass Comp
19.3
18.5
-
Pass Att
28.6
35.5
-
Comp %
67.2%
52.1%
-
Pass Yards
240.4
192.8
-
Sacks
1.1
2.9
-
Sack Yards
6.0
19.8
-
Sack %
3.8%
7.5%
-
Pass Plays
29.8
38.4
-
Net Pass Yards
234.4
173.0
-
YPPP
7.9
4.5
Total
-
Total Plays
67.1
72.3
-
Total Yards
451.3
297.1
-
YPPL
6.7
4.1
TO
-
Int
0.8
1.6
-
Int %
2.6%
4.6%
-
Fumbles
0.9
0.5
-
Turnovers
1.6
2.1
Straight Up: ,
Against the Spread:
* game log stats denoted as Off/Def
| 2020 Game Log |
RUSHING PLAYS |
PASSING PLAYS |
TOTAL |
| Opponent |
Score |
Spread |
Atts |
Yds |
Yprp |
Fum |
Comp |
Att |
Yds |
Int |
Sack |
Yppp |
Yds |
Yppl |
| 09/19/20 @ Oklahoma St. |
7-16 |
+23.5
W
|
30/41 |
121/176 |
4.0/4.3 |
0/1 |
18/17 |
28/22 |
157/203 |
1/1 |
1/4 |
5.4/7.8 |
278/379 |
4.7/5.7 |
| 10/03/20 @ UCF |
34-26 |
+21.0
W
|
41/33 |
174/128 |
4.2/3.9 |
2/2 |
17/28 |
29/51 |
251/327 |
1/1 |
3/1 |
7.8/6.3 |
425/455 |
5.8/5.4 |
| 10/23/20 @ South Florida |
42-13 |
-11.0
W
|
37/33 |
227/126 |
6.1/3.8 |
0/2 |
17/22 |
25/36 |
242/181 |
1/1 |
0/1 |
9.7/4.9 |
469/307 |
7.6/4.4 |
| 10/30/20 East Carolina |
34-30 |
-17.0
L
|
34/27 |
191/126 |
5.6/4.7 |
1/2 |
19/38 |
37/50 |
232/330 |
2/1 |
3/0 |
5.8/6.6 |
423/456 |
5.7/5.9 |
| 11/14/20 SMU |
28-24 |
+1.0
W
|
41/38 |
165/169 |
4.0/4.4 |
1/0 |
26/18 |
38/36 |
305/182 |
1/1 |
3/2 |
7.4/4.8 |
470/351 |
5.7/4.6 |
| 11/19/20 Tulane |
30-24 |
-5.5
W
|
37/49 |
203/233 |
5.5/4.8 |
2/0 |
27/8 |
47/17 |
316/69 |
1/1 |
4/2 |
6.2/3.6 |
519/302 |
5.9/4.4 |
| 12/05/20 @ Navy |
19-6 |
-12.0
W
|
38/48 |
139/158 |
3.7/3.3 |
1/1 |
10/4 |
25/10 |
168/-5 |
0/0 |
0/5 |
6.7/-0.3 |
307/153 |
4.9/2.4 |
Straight Up: ,
Against the Spread:
* game log stats denoted as Off/Def
| 2020 Game Log |
RUSHING PLAYS |
PASSING PLAYS |
TOTAL |
| Opponent |
Score |
Spread |
Atts |
Yds |
Yprp |
Fum |
Comp |
Att |
Yds |
Int |
Sack |
Yppp |
Yds |
Yppl |
| 09/19/20 Austin Peay |
55-20 |
0.0
W
|
39/36 |
225/94 |
5.8/2.6 |
1/0 |
17/22 |
26/39 |
244/162 |
0/1 |
2/1 |
8.7/4.1 |
469/256 |
7.0/3.4 |
| 09/26/20 Army |
24-10 |
-13.5
W
|
31/42 |
89/189 |
2.9/4.5 |
1/1 |
19/9 |
34/21 |
251/87 |
1/1 |
1/1 |
7.2/4.0 |
340/276 |
5.2/4.3 |
| 10/03/20 South Florida |
28-7 |
-21.0
T
|
44/30 |
207/72 |
4.7/2.4 |
1/0 |
16/22 |
26/41 |
136/203 |
3/5 |
1/3 |
5.0/4.6 |
343/275 |
4.8/3.7 |
| 10/24/20 @ SMU |
42-13 |
+1.0
W
|
35/35 |
283/115 |
8.1/3.3 |
2/0 |
13/23 |
21/45 |
126/189 |
0/1 |
0/4 |
6.0/3.9 |
409/304 |
7.3/3.6 |
| 10/31/20 Memphis |
49-10 |
-6.5
W
|
38/23 |
212/51 |
5.6/2.2 |
0/1 |
21/18 |
26/35 |
262/276 |
1/0 |
2/6 |
9.4/6.7 |
474/327 |
7.2/5.1 |
| 11/07/20 Houston |
38-10 |
-13.0
W
|
38/27 |
344/102 |
9.1/3.8 |
0/1 |
20/20 |
30/34 |
180/180 |
1/1 |
0/1 |
6.0/5.1 |
524/282 |
7.7/4.5 |
| 11/13/20 East Carolina |
55-17 |
-27.5
W
|
30/46 |
210/236 |
7.0/5.1 |
1/1 |
27/9 |
34/21 |
350/62 |
0/3 |
1/4 |
10.0/2.5 |
560/298 |
8.6/4.2 |
| 11/21/20 @ UCF |
36-33 |
-6.0
L
|
44/32 |
165/134 |
3.8/4.2 |
1/0 |
21/25 |
32/48 |
326/225 |
0/1 |
2/3 |
9.6/4.4 |
491/359 |
6.3/4.3 |
